Legal Opinion

Landrum v. Fulton, Supt. of Banks

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherick, P. J.

The plaintiff, Inez Landrum, appeals her cause to this court. She seeks a judgment against the liquidating officer, I. J. Fulton, and asks that her claim be allowed as a preference. A statement of the petition’s averments is not necessary for an understanding of the issue presented.

The second defense contained in the defendant’s answer presents the only question submitted to and considered by this court. There is no transcript of the evidence before us. Certain facts, however, are conceded to be true. These, together with the pleadings, we consider in determining the sufficiency of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. WagnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Cover v. Hildebran, Exrx.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Beverly v. BeverlyOhio Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API