Legal Opinion
Albert L. Meredith v. Navistar International Transportation Corporation, and Its Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 18, 1991No. 90-1989PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Chief Judge.
The issue in this appeal is whether Ap-pellee Navistar International Transportation Corp. and its retirement plan (collectively “Navistar”) discharged and/or discriminated against Appellant Albert Meredith in order to interfere with Meredith’s pension rights, in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. After a two-day bench trial, the district court found that Meredith had failed to produce any evidence of “any intent whatsoever on anybody’s part” to interfere with his ERISA rights, and, therefore, entered judgment in favor…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- William T. Turner v. Schering-Plough CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Morton M. Hill, Jr. v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Nachwalter v. ChristieCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Anna Mustafa v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- In the Matter of Oil Spill by the Amoco Cadiz Off the Coast of France on March 16, 1978Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Tamyra S. Bowerman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated and Associates' Health and Welfare PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Consuela Quinn v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Carter v. PATHFINDER ENERGY SERVICES, INC.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.