Legal Opinion

Hatten v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 1, 2014No. 5D14-888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Joseph F. Hatten (defendant) appeals the final order entered by the trial court summarily denying his post-conviction motion. Determining that the trial court erred in concluding that the motion was untimely filed, we reverse and remand for consideration as a timely-filed rule 3.850 motion.

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b) requires a motion under that rule to be filed within two years from the date the defendant’s judgment and sentence become final.

On November 7, 2011, the defendant entered a no contest plea to sex charges in two circuit court cases. Since he did not file a direct…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Mann v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  3. Walk v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blair v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API