Legal Opinion

In re Tanz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 11, 1932Published

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York on November 5, 1913, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, First Department.

By the petition herein the respondent was charged with professional misconduct substantially as follows:

That in the month of October, 1929, the respondent represented one Mary Toporoff in the sale of the H. M. R. Stationery Co., Inc., *560to Minerva Cohen. In connection with said sale there was deposited with the respondent by Minerva Cohen the sum of $200, pursuant to an escrow agreement which provided…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re TanzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API