Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLC

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 29, 2004No. C7-03-94Published

1Dissent

ANDERSON, Russell A.

(dissenting).

Because the majority ignores both the intent of the legislature and our longstanding precedent, I respectfully dissent. Chapter 82 of the Minnesota Statutes is a comprehensive and mandatory statutory scheme for the regulation of real estate brokers and salespersons.1 No person is *333to act as a real estate broker, salesperson, or real estate closing agent unless licensed. Minn.Stat. § 82.19, subd. 1 (2002). In fact, we have made clear that an unlicensed real estate broker may not maintain an action for the collection of a commission. Relocation Realty Services…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marks v. Walter G. McCarty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Lynn Beechler Realty Co. v. WarnygoraCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Relocation Realty Services Corp. v. Carlson CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. DELLWOOD ENTERPRISES v. Pac. Am. Real Estate FundDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1981
  5. Douglas v. SchuetteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API