Legal Opinion

Coppola v. Beeson (In Re Coppola)

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 25, 2005No. 04-20311, 04-21013PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In these consolidated appeals, Debtor Coppola challenges a judgment denying his retirement annuity account exemption in bankruptcy and a separate judgment that the same account is not a “retirement system” account under Chapter 821 of the Texas Government Code, protected from the consequences of assignments or pledges. For the reasons stated herein, we AFFIRM the lower courts’ judgments.

BACKGROUND

On October 11, 1999, Joseph C. Coppola and his wife Sheri Lyn Beeson divorced. The divorce decree provides for fifty-three monthly alimony payments of $4,000, totaling $212,000, which were declared…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of James S. YOUNG, Debtor. James S. YOUNG, Appellant, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. Goetz v. GoetzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Plunk v. Yaquinto (In Re Plunk)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  2. Kinlaw v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts v. Zars (In Re Zars)District Court, W.D. Texas · 2010
  4. Hawk v. Engelhart (In re Hawk)District Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
  5. Kinlaw v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API