In Re Disciplinary Action Against Britton
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF PUBLIC REPRIMAND
A formal proceeding for discipline was instituted by the Disciplinary Board after investigation of a complaint filed against James R. Britton. A hearing was held before a three-member hearing panel and the Report of the Hearing Panel recommending public reprimand was filed with the Supreme Court on February 11, 1987.
The hearing panel considered the evidence, including the Affidavit which Brit-ton filed with his Answer to the Formal Complaint, and found that Britton accepted a case for which he received a retainer; that Britton’s Affidavit showed work done but provided…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. EllisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. DisselhorstNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. BrittonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Disciplinary Action Against BrittonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. DisselhorstNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989