Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 19, 1999No. C5-98-1812PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARVEY A. HOLTAN, Judge *

Appellant, convicted of first-degree burglary, argues that the sentencing court erred by ordering execution of the presumptively stayed sentence for his offense on the basis of two decayed felony burglary convictions. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Bryan Keith Jones was convicted for two felony burglaries in 1980. Both convictions expired, or “decayed,” more than 15 years before he was again convicted of first-degree burglary in 1998. Pursuant to the sentencing guidelines, neither decayed conviction was included in the computation of appellant’s criminal history…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. United States v. Andre Dion Jones, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Guth v. FabianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  2. In Re IrwinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  3. State v. KNAEBLECourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  4. State v. RourkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  5. In Re GuyotUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API