Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. v. Meux

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

delivered tlie opinion of tlie Court.

This case is before ns upon motion of defendants to transfer and advance it for hearing at Nashville during the present term. The court expressed a 'willingness to grant the motion if consented to by the complainants. They, however, not only refused to so consent, but are resisting the motion.

By section 154, Code of 1932, the court is given authority to transfer and advance for hearing “emergency causes.” This is a very salutary statute and the court does not hesitate to exercise the power conferred thereby in a proper case, but it should be defined to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Foster v. HarleTennessee Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. PrietoTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API