State Ex Rel. v. Meux
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney
delivered tlie opinion of tlie Court.
This case is before ns upon motion of defendants to transfer and advance it for hearing at Nashville during the present term. The court expressed a 'willingness to grant the motion if consented to by the complainants. They, however, not only refused to so consent, but are resisting the motion.
By section 154, Code of 1932, the court is given authority to transfer and advance for hearing “emergency causes.” This is a very salutary statute and the court does not hesitate to exercise the power conferred thereby in a proper case, but it should be defined to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Foster v. HarleTennessee Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by1 opinion
- Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. PrietoTennessee Supreme Court · 1934