Horton v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of the United States
1DissentJustice Clark, joined by The Chief Justice, Justice Brennan and Justice Stewart
The Court turns a new furrow in the field of diversity jurisdiction today and, in so doing, plows under a rule of almost a quarter of a century’s standing — the rule that in determining jurisdiction, “the sum claimed by the plaintiff controls if the claim is apparently made in good faith.” St. Paul Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co., 303 U. S. 283, 288 (1938). Here the respondent Insurance Company filed suit “to set aside” an award of $1,050 given Horton by the Texas Industrial Accident Board. The Court, instead of testing the jurisdictional amount by this sum, looks instead to allegations of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.