Legal Opinion

Mauldin v. Kendrick

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 12, 1941No. 13875PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

To a petition as amended, praying for injunction and damages, a demurrer was interposed, on which the judge entered an order as follows: “After hearing arguments of counsel upon the within demurrer, the said demurrer is sustained in so far as it attacks the equitable relief sought, and overruled in so far as the suit for damages is concerned.” The plaintiff excepted. The only error assigned is on this ruling. Held, that the motion to dismiss the writ of error must be granted, the bill of exceptions having been prematurely sued out, the only ruling complained of not being one…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Henry & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Roddenbery v. PattersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. Randolph CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  2. Robinson v. Georgia Power CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Evans v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. Joyner v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API