Legal Opinion

Anders v. A.D. Jacobson, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1998No. WD 54113PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLIS, Judge.

Buddy M. Anders appeals from the trial court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of his claim against A.D. Jacobson, Inc.

In March, 1994, Anders was an employee of TinMaster, Inc. TinMaster was a sheet metal subcontractor for A.D. Jacobson, who was the mechanical subcontractor for Walton Construction. Walton Construction was the general contractor hired by the City of Kansas City for a particular phase of the Bartle Hall Expansion.

On March 14, 1994, Anders was working with a fellow TinMaster employee as well as two employees of A.D. Jacobson. This “composite crew”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bass v. National Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. RyanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  3. Graves v. Central Electric Power CooperativeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  4. Mooney v. Missouri Athletic ClubMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Bauer Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Ming v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1999
  3. Holmes v. Interiors by CanovaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API