State v. Bennett
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Concurrence
| FITZSIMMONS, Judge,
concurring in part with reasons.
I must concur in the result reached by the majority on the issue of the propriety of the trial court’s ruling denying admissibility of a recorded statement by defendant.
Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 801(D)(1) provides that a prior statement of a witness is not hearsay if:
[t]he declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is: ... (b) [consistent with his testimony and is offered to rebut an express or implied charge against him of recent fabrication…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. GibsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- State v. MiltoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999