Legal Opinion

Tanenbaum v. Nanes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Action to recover commissions for services rendered in procuring the sale of real property to defendants. In order to prove that plaintiff procured the seller of the property to enter into a contract with defendants, plaintiff sought to introduce testimony of conversations with the owner of the property and her representative. It was error to have excluded these conversations. A broker’s transactions with a proposed seller or buyer are admissible to show that he was performing the services to perform which he was hired. Judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pomerantz v. SussmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API