Legal Opinion

Rosner v. Paley

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the order of the Supreme Court which dismissed the third-party complaint, reinstated.

This action was commenced by plaintiff against her former attorneys, defendants and third-party plaintiffs, Sharretts, Paley, Carter & Blauvelt, P. C. (“Paley”), to recover damages as a result of legal malpractice in advising her to enter into a 1978 agreement in settlement of a dispute over the alleged mismanagement of the family trust. The agreement had designated plaintiff a cotrustee with her mother and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Rogers v. Dorchester AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Pike v. . HonsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Nolechek v. GesualeNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API