Donoho v. Carwile
Court of Appeals of Texas
Error from District Court, Dallas County; E. B. Muse, Judge. Shit by C. D. Donoho and others against W. L. Carwile and others.. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring’ error.
1Opinion of the CourtRasbuky, J.
The plaintiffs in error, C. D. Donoho, P. K. Thompson, A. S. Laird, and E. G. Senter, filed this suit in the court below against the defendants in error, W. L. Carwile, S. J. McFarland, Edwin Hobby, and the Interurban Land & Development Company, a private corporation. For the sake of brevity, they will be hereinafter alluded to, respectively, as plaintiffs and defendants; that being their positions in the trial court.
The suit was grounded upon eight promissory notes executed by the defendant Interurban Land & Development Company, dated June 13, 1913, each for the principal sum of $1,562.50,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clark v. HillsTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Gilliam v. AlfordTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. McCartyTexas Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by12 opinions
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Moore v. B. & M. Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Weeks v. LippCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Duckworth v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.