Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Stevens

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit by the appellees upon three promissory notes. The complaint contained but one paragraph. It was- not attacked for any cause by demurrer or motion. 'The paragraph was faulty for duplicity, which might have been corrected on motion to separate. Bick. Civil Pr. 66. Answer in two affirmative paragraphs :

1. Failure of consideration ;.2. Duress.

Demurrers were sustained to the paragraphs of answer. "'The defendants elected to stand upon the rulings on their •demurrers, refused to answer, and the plaintiffs had judgment for the amount due on the notes.

It is assigned for error that the court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Snyder v. BradenIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Mix v. EllsworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Finance Corp. of New England, Inc. v. MaynardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Salt Springs National Bank v. SchlosserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Darling v. HinesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. McClellandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. State v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API