Legal Opinion

Holland v. Holland

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 1947No. 20783PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By SKEEL, J.

This case comes to this court on questions of law from two final orders of the trial court, the first of which being a finding of guilty on a charge of contempt of one Dorothy Roesler who was not a party to the suit, and the second being an order modifying a previous order concerning the custody of the minor children of the parties.

*238The record in this case is, to say the least, incomplete. On October 31, 1946, a motion to show cause for non-payment of alimony was filed and defendant was served with notice of ;such motion. On November 15, 1946 defendant filed a motion to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mollencamp v. MollencampOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Mahoney v. MahoneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Campbell v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stanford v. StanfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Beamer v. BeamerOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. McQueary v. McQuearyMonroe County Court of Common Pleas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API