Legal Opinion

People v. Gordon

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jill Konviser, J.

*619The issue before this court is whether the failure of the grand jury to render a decision on the merits of a fully presented case is a legitimate reason to permit the People to re-present the case to a future grand jury. This court finds that the grand jury’s indecision constitutes such a legitimate reason and, thus, the People are authorized to re-present the case to a future grand jury.1

Background

On March 23 and March 24, 2006, the People presented evidence to a grand jury in the above-captioned case. The evidence consisted of testimony from the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. v. StormsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. People v. WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. DykesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. People v. GelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. GriffithCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008
  2. People v. HutchinsonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2016
  3. People v. PeterNew York Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API