People v. Gordon
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jill Konviser, J.
*619The issue before this court is whether the failure of the grand jury to render a decision on the merits of a fully presented case is a legitimate reason to permit the People to re-present the case to a future grand jury. This court finds that the grand jury’s indecision constitutes such a legitimate reason and, thus, the People are authorized to re-present the case to a future grand jury.1
Background
On March 23 and March 24, 2006, the People presented evidence to a grand jury in the above-captioned case. The evidence consisted of testimony from the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. v. StormsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. DykesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. GelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. GriffithCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008
- People v. HutchinsonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2016
- People v. PeterNew York Supreme Court · 2008