Legal Opinion

Stilson v. Gibbs

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1879PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo. Trespass on the case. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The grievance alleged by the plaintiff in this case is that the defendant took from his possession his crop of wheat, then harvested and in the mow in his barn, and proceeded to thresh the same with an imperfect machine, whereby much of it was wasted, and that he carried away the remainder without leaving sufficient for six months’ provision for the plaintiff and his family. When the proof was introduced it appeared that the alleged wrong was the act of one Montague, a deputy of the defendant, who was then sheriff of the county of Kalamazoo, and that what Montague did was under the *44pretended…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stilson v. GibbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Isaacs v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Stilson v. GibbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API