Legal Opinion

Clarence W. Dupnik, Sheriff of Pima County v. United States of America, United States of America Small Business Administration, Cross- Claimant/appellee v. Centuras Investment Company, Inc., an Arizona Corporation, Cross-Claim Centuras Investment Company, Inc., an Arizona Corporation, Cross- Claimant/appellant v. United States of America Small Business Administration, Cross-Claim

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 3, 1988No. 87-1774Published

1Opinion of the Court

848 F.2d 1476

Clarence W. DUPNIK, Sheriff of Pima County, Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants,

UNITED STATES of America; Small Business Administration,

Cross- Claimant/Appellee,

v.

CENTURAS INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC., an Arizona corporation,

Cross-Claim Defendant/Appellant,

CENTURAS INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC., an Arizona corporation,

Cross- Claimant/Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES of America; Small Business Administration,

Cross-Claim Defendant/Appellee.

No. 87-1774.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1988.*

Decided June 3, 1988.

Patrick J. Farrell, Corey & Farrell,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API