Legal Opinion
Stanfield v. Hartford Acc. and Indem. Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 22, 1991No. 89-1249PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
581 So.2d 340 (1991)
Donald STANFIELD, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 89-1249.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.
May 22, 1991.
Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell, Raymond Brown, Jr., Alexandria, for plaintiffs-appellees.
Gist, Methvin, Hughes & Munsterman, David Hughes, Alexandria, for defendant-appellant.
Before DOMENGEAUX, C.J., and GUIDRY and LABORDE, JJ.
LABORDE, Judge.
This is an appeal from the trial court's judgment declaring that a policy of garage liability insurance issued by Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Graves v. Traders & General Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
- CHF Finance Company v. JochumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
- Connecticut Indemnity Co. v. CordascoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Dette v. Covington Motors, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
3Cited by17 opinions
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. JordanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Gambino v. LamulleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Baker v. KenneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
- Savana v. CERTAIN INTERESTED UNDERWRITERSLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Spurlin v. Merchants InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.