Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pierce v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2007No. 05-145Published

1DissentBurke, Justice

[T25] I respectfully dissent, and would affirm the district court's decision that this was a valid search incident to arrest and reasonable under all of the circumstances. In my view, the majority reaches the opposite result by misapplying the standard of review, marginalizing officer safety as a factor to be weighed in the analysis, and overlooking the most meaningful difference between the state and federal standards.

[126] As part of its standard of review, the majority recites that "evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the district court's determination." It then proceeds to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Washington v. ChrismanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API