Legal Opinion

Cumberland v. Household Research Corp. of America

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 9, 1956No. Civ. A. 55-468PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, District Judge.

This is an action brought by a resident of Virginia, hereinafter called buyer, against Household Research Corporation, a Massachusetts seller, and one Nolan, a Massachusetts manufacturer, hereinafter called maker, of a household disinfectant whose tradename I will abbreviate to Pine. At the conclusion of the evidence defendants moved for directed verdicts, which were denied. The jury having returned verdicts for $5,000, the defendants now move for judgment n. o. v., or in the alternative, for a new trial.

One ground of the first motion is alleged to be lack of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nelson v. KeeferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  2. Walter Jaconski v. Avisun Corporation and W. v. Pangborne & Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  3. Magee v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. National Surety Corporation v. ChamberlainDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1959
  5. Payton v. FreezeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API