Legal Opinion

Watson v. Bayliss

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1913No. 10491PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gay, J., entered January 19, 1912, dismissing an action on contract, after a trial to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

This is an action for damages for an alleged breach of a parol contract. The plaintiff has appealed from an adverse judgment. It is alleged:

“That on or about the 24th day of May, A. D., 1909, in the city of Seattle, state of Washington, the defendant, Edward M. Bayliss, with the design of deceiving, cheating and defrauding the plaintiff and of appropriating to his own use and to the use of said community certain money of the plaintiff, hereinafter mentioned, deceitfully and fraudulently, by inducements and promises hereinafter mentioned, persuaded and induced the plaintiff to purchase a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Loewenberg v. De VoigneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Pasco Reclamation Co. v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. McDonnell v. Coeur D'Alene Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Monahan v. AllenMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Weldon v. DeganWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Smith v. AdelbergWashington Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API