Legal Opinion

Jones v. Poole

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 10, 1908No. 1108PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion to dismiss the writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

1. This case is practically identical as to its facts with that of Anderson v. Hall, 3 Ga. App. 555 (60 S. E. 294) ; and the writ of error must be dismissed. There is no exception to a final judgment in the court below. It does not appear from the record that a final judgment was rendered. Furthermore, the exceptions to the refusal of the amendment were not preserved pendente lite, nor would a different result have been reached had the trial judge allowed the amendment.

2. This court is without jurisdiction to consider a direct bill of exceptions to a ruling made pendente lite, unless there be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lyndon v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Anderson v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Becker v. FairmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. James v. SerittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Enecks v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Becker v. FairmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API