Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Faust

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1995No. A95A0111PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Presiding Judge.

On January 29, 1992, plaintiffs Linda and Larry Faust sued defendant Dr. Michael Roberts for medical malpractice and loss of consortium. Plaintiffs did not file an expert’s affidavit contemporaneously with their complaint as required by OCGA § 9-11-9.1 (a). But they did invoke OCGA § 9-11-9.1 (b) by alleging that the statute of limitation for their claims would expire within ten days, and that due to this time constraint an expert’s affidavit could not be prepared. Consequently, plaintiffs automatically received a 45-day filing extension. See OCGA § 9-11-9.1 (b). The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sisk v. PatelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. Reid v. BrazilCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Waldroup v. Greene County Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Brown v. Middle Georgia Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  2. Allen v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. Roberts v. FaustCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API