Legal Opinion
Sievers v. Green (In Re Green)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 14, 1986No. Bankruptcy App. Panel No. OR-86-1168-MeEAs, Bankruptcy No. 385-01707PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEYERS, Bankruptcy Judge:
This appeal raises the question of whether a trial court is required, as a matter of law, to dismiss a Chapter 13 case after the Debtors defaulted on scheduled payments. We conclude that no such requirement exists and AFFIRM.
Linda Sievers entered into a land sale contract with Gary Walter Randolph Green and Jenelle L. Green (“Debtors”), wherein Sievers was to receive $102,000 payable in monthly installments. After the Debtors fell behind in these payments, they filed a Chapter 13 petition. Immediately after confirmation of their Chapter 13 plan, the Debtors fell…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of HearnUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 1982
- In Re SandoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- In Re BenediktssonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1983
- In Re JarvisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1982
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re: Nina Marie Barbieri, Debtor. Nina Marie Barbieri, Debtor-Appellant v. Raj Acquisition Corp. Chapter 7 Trustee TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- In Re BlaiseBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Second Circuit · 1998
- Booher Enterprises v. Eastown Auto Co. (In Re Eastown Auto Co.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- In Re MoseleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1987
- Loya v. Rapp (In Re Loya)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.