Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1986No. 19283PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

The appellant, David Tyrone Smith, was convicted by a jury of burglary and theft, both third degree felonies. On appeal he argues: (1) U.C.A., 1953, § 76-6-402 establishes an unconstitutional presumption that one in possession of recently stolen property is guilty of having stolen it and that that presumption is not constitutionally sufficient by itself to support a guilty verdict; (2) his wife should not have been permitted to testify against him over his objection; (3) he was forced to testify to rebut the presumption contained in § 76-6-402 in violation of his Fifth…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Barnes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. State v. DiRienzoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  5. Elijah "Tootie Pie" Cosby, Jr. v. Tom Jones, Warden of the Walker County Correctional InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Fortson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. NeedsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. State v. LymanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API