Legal Opinion
Eubanks v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 26, 2009No. 08-6169PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part and reversed in part by published opinion. Judge TRAXLER wrote the opinion, in which Judge DUNCAN and Judge AGEE joined.
OPINION
TRAXLER, Circuit Judge:
Anthony Eubanks appeals a district court order granting summary judgment against him in his ex post facto challenge to a South Carolina law requiring that certain prisoners provide DNA samples for South Carolina’s DNA bank and pay a $250 processing fee before being paroled or released. We affirm the district court’s ruling regarding the constitutionality of the requirements that a sample be provided and that the processing fee…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re DNA Ex Post Facto IssuesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Tammie Thompson v. Ciox Health, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022