Legal Opinion

Peek v. Berry

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 28, 1944No. 13539PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOONEY, Justice.

The introductory facts as gleaned from appellants’ petition are these: Prior to January, 1939, G. S. Berry and wife Ethel Berry, appellees herein, owned and operated a general mercantile business in the City of Greenville, Texas, and for about ten years prior to that date, Gilmer Peek, deceased, husband and father, respectively, of the appellants, worked for the Ber-rys in their business as general manager and bookkeeper, on a salary and commission basis, but about January 1, 1939, the relationship of the parties was changed, that is, they entered into an agreement by which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Quinn v. PressTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Shaw v. BushCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Rose v. First St. Bk. of ParisTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Bankers Securities Corp. v. Ritz Carlton Restaurant & Hotel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peek v. BeeryTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. City & County of Dallas v. CramerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API