Legal Opinion

Hughs v. Gold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 8, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, Eileen T. Gold appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Miller, J.), dated November 21, 1985, which denied her motion to strike certain paragraphs of the plaintiff’s bill of particulars as nonresponsive.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff’s responses to the appellant’s demand for a bill of particulars are sufficiently responsive under the circumstances of this case (see, Cirelli v Victory Mem. Hosp., 45 AD2d 856; Patterson v Jewish Hosp. & Med. Center, 94 Misc 2d 680; affd 65 AD2d 553).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cirelli v. Victory Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. Patterson v. Jewish Hospital & Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Patterson v. Jewish Hospital & Medical CenterNew York Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City & Suburban Delivery Systems, Inc. v. Green's Cards & Gifts, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1996
  2. Ohnemus v. RosenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API