Legal Opinion

J.C. Kinley Co. v. Haynie Wire Line Service, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided November 27, 1985No. 01-85-0364-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAM BASS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of appellees.

We affirm.

In 1947, appellants, J.K. Kinley Co., et al. (“Kinley”) obtained U.S. Patent 2,426,106 for an oil well perforating gun and later obtained U.S. Patents 2,540,122 and 2,544,-601 for improvements on the 1947 patent.

In 1957, appellees, Haynie Wire Line Service, Inc., et al. (“Haynie”) entered into a nonexclusive, nontransferable license to use the inventions of Kinley relating to oil field perforating guns, equipment, and parts under the patents listed above. The license provided:

“... that Licensee…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Brownlee v. BrownleeTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. " MOORE" BURGER, INC. v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Gaines v. HammanTexas Supreme Court · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Seatrax, Inc. v. Sonbeck International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  2. In the Matter of Placid Oil Company, Debtor. Professional Geophysics, Inc. v. Placid Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  3. General Universal Systems, Inc. v. Hal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Attayi, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  5. Kendall v. Whataburger, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API