Legal Opinion

South Florida Blood Bank, Inc. v. Futch

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 28, 2000No. Nos. 4D99-1053, 4D99-1348 and 4D99-1349Published

1Opinion of the CourtGross, J.

In the lawsuit below, appellee/cross-ap-pellant Clara Futch obtained a judgment against her employer, South Florida Blood Banks, Inc., for medical costs under the Blood Bank’s health plan. We reverse, because Futch’s failure to exhaust her administrative remedies under the health plan rendered her suit premature.

The Blood Bank’s health plan was administered by Hospital Benefits, Inc. On June 28, 1995, the president of Hospital Benefits wrote Futch and told her that there was no coverage available for certain medical claims based on the plan’s “preexisting conditions limitation.” The letter…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Amato v. BernardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Dorothy T. Makar Anthony L. Makar, Her Husband v. Health Care Corporation of the Mid-Atlantic (Carefirst) Provident Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  3. Ethelene Springer v. Wal-Mart Associates' Group Health PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. Curry v. Contract Fabricators Inc. Profit Sharing PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. J.W. Counts v. American General Life And Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API