Stickel v. Stickel
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Hearing on an appeal by tbe respondent from an order of tbe Supreme Court of tbe District of Columbia in an habeas corpus proceeding awarding tbe custody of a child to tbe petitioner. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard
delivered tbe opinion of tbe Court:
Tbe parties to tbis appeal are husband and wife. They were married in tbis District on June 17, 1898, and have one child, named Frederick Stickel, who is an infant something more than two years old. Until about March 1, 1901, they lived together in a bouse occupied by tbe wife’s mother, in the city of Washington. Appellant left tbe bouse on account of disagreement with bis mother-in-law, and took up bis residence with bis own mother, who lived a few blocks away. Appellee refused to accompany him, and declined an offer to live with him elsewhere. Tbe child…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Boone v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Bazemore v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Elijah M. Seidenberg v. Martha E. SeidenbergCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Bartlett v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Bazemore v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.