Legal Opinion

Hammer v. Gibbons and Reed Company

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1973No. 13132PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLETT, Justice:

Mr. Hammer, the appellant, was employed by a joint venture operating under the name of “Solar Pond Complex” and consisting of the respondent and two other large construction companies. The joint venture agreement set forth, in the following language, the purposes for which it was entered into:

NOW, THEREFORE, said parties hereto hereby constitute themselves as Joint Venturers for the purpose of performing and completing the Construction Contract, but not for any other purposes, it being expressly understood that this agreement contemplates only the furnishing and performance of…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. USA Power, LLC v. PacifiCorpUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Telum, Inc. v. E.F. Hutton Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. Salt Lake City Corp. v. James Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  4. Sittner v. Big Horn Tar Sands & Oil, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Boatman v. George Hyman Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API