Legal Opinion

E. C. Carter, & Son, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 11, 1957No. C. D. 1889PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

This suit challenges the classification of the collector of certain imported merchandise as “Other Nets” and the consequent levy of duty thereon at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1529 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802. Plaintiff claims said merchandise to be properly dutiable at the rate of 25 per centum ad valorem under said paragraph 1529 (a), as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T. D. 52739, as lace, made…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kotzin Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. Mutual China Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  3. Shalom v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  4. Shalom & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Rifkin Textiles Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Rifkin Textiles Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. American Fabrics Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Bamberger v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  5. Bartmann & Bixer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API