Morrill v. Madden
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district .court for Waseca county, Buckham, J., presiding, overruling a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderbuegh, J.
In June, 1859, plaintiff’s intestate, Foster Mor-rill, became the owner, by assignment, of a judgment for upwards of $500, against the defendant, which had been duly docketed in Wa-seca county. In 1865. an action was brought on such judgment by Foster Morrill, and a new judgment was duly recovered and docketed in the district court of the same county in his favor, and against the *494defendant, for the sum of $1,019.83. The complaint shows that before the recovery of the original judgment the defendant owned a large amount of property in Waseca county, sufficient to satisfy the same, which he…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Thomos v. MurraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Kempf v. RangerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Dole v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Cobb v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Estate of Stonecipher v. Estate of ButtsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.