Hardin v. Jamison
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeals by A. P. Jamison and others from a; judgment of the district court for Waseca county, affirming an order of the probate court for that county directing letters testamentary to issue to the executors named in the will of Chancey Hardin, and from an order, Buck-am, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.
The will of the testator, Chancey Hardin, was duly proved at the place of his domicile in Illinois, and letters testamentary issued to the three executors named in the will. Thereupon a copy of such foreign will and such probate thereof, duly authenticated, was filed by such foreign executors in the probate court of Waseca county, in this state, with a petition that letters testamenta*113ry be issued to them by that court. The will was thereupon duly allowed by said probate court under and pursuant to sections 32 and 33 of the Probate Code. (Laws 1889, c. 46; G. S. 1894, §§ 4439, 4440). The…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Babcock v. CollinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Purcell v. CramtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944