Legal Opinion
Parrish v. Jackson W. Jones, P.C.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 22, 2006No. A05A2291PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bernes, Judge.
George Parrish appeals from the trial court’s final order granting summary judgment in favor of appellees Jackson W. Jones, PC. (“Jones”) and Hamilton Financial Services, Inc. (“HFS”) on his claims alleging fraud and breach of contract. For the following reasons, we affirm.
Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA§ 9-11-56 (c).Adenovo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Results Oriented, Inc. v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Dyer v. HoneaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Willson v. Appalachian Oak Flooring & Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Green v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Nash v. StuddardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Mark Vernon v. Assurance Forensic Accounting, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Onbrand Media v. Codex Consulting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Greenwald v. OdomCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- McIntee v. DeramusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.