Legal Opinion

People v. Otto

California Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1888No. 11202PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Del Norte County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSearls, C. J.

This is an appeal by the defendants, William M. Waggle, J. L. Lake, and James K. Johnson, sureties on the bond of William H. Otto, sheriff and ex officio tax collector of the county of Del Norte, from a judgment against them for $1,769.31, on account of taxes collected by said Otto for the fiscal year ending July 1, 1885. »

Judgment was rendered upon the pleadings as to the appellants, and upon the default of defendant Otto.

The complaint is not verified. The answer sets out by denying generally all the material allegations of the complaint, “except such allegations as are hereinafter admitted,…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Diruzza v. County of TehamaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. People v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Crowell v. BarhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  4. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API