Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Mott v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 17, 1976No. 51915, 51916Published

1ConcurrenceDouglas, Judge

One of the main contentions of Roady is that he had inadequate representation of counsel. To further show that there was no inadequate representation, some of the contentions will be discussed more fully.

Appellants argue that the charge as submitted to the jury allowed him to be convicted on the basis of a lesser culpable mental state than charged in the indictment and presents a lengthy dissertation on the definitions of culpable mental states as set out in V.T.C.A. Penal Code Section 6.03. They assert that “ . . . since the grand jury alleged both, the highest culpable mental state…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lowe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  2. Odell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Louden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Kemp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Meek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API