Legal Opinion

Ramsey v. Ramsey

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 2, 1931No. 11PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richards, J.,

charging the jury:

This action has been brought by Ethel H. Ramsey, the plaintiff, against Caroline J. Ramsey and Robert R. Redington, the defendants, to recover damages for the injury which she claims to have sustained by the loss of the affections of her husband, Joseph G. Ramsey.

*578The various counts of the plaintiff’s declaration charge that the defendants were responsible for her loss of her said husband’s affections, and the damage resulting therefrom. This charge is denied by the defendants.

We have been requested to instruct you to return a verdict for the plaintiff against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Nashville Railway & Light Co. v. TrawickTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Lupton v. UnderwoodSuperior Court of Delaware · 1912
  4. Hitchens v. Wilmington & Philadelphia Traction Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wiener v. MarkelSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Carol E. Thouron v. Carol Victoria K. McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  3. Carol E. Thouron v. Carol Victoria K. McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API