Legal Opinion
Setley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 30, 1982No. Appeal, No. 3112 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION by
Judge Doyle,
Gerald C. Setley, (Claimant) appeals from the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of a referee to deny workmen’s compensation benefits. For the reasons which follow, we affirm the order of the Board.
Claimant is employed as a junior technician in the research and development department of Kawecki Berylco Industries (Employer). Although Claimant *243usually worked during the second shift (8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.), one of the conditions of Ms employment required that he he available to work different shifts. On Friday, December…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Halaski v. Hilton HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Davis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Tredyffrin-Easttown School District v. BreyerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Capitol International Airways, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Rabenstein v. State Workmen's Insurance FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Peterson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Rox Coal Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- William F. Rittner Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Helinek v. HelinekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Biddle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.