Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Wallinger

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 12, 1919PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of city of Richmond in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants assign error. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

This is an action of assumpsit brought by Amelia C. Wallinger against E. F. Schmidt, A. D. Smith and Jno. M. Brandt, jointly and severally as individuals, and against the same persons as partners under the firm name.of E. F. Schmidt & Co. The declaration contains the common counts and a special. count to the following effect: That on or about the 11th of December, 1915, the plaintiff owned a house and lot in the city of Richmond and employed the defendants as her agents, upon an agreed commission, to trade the same for farm property; that a price and value was fixed on the house and lot by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ferguson & Fries v. GoochSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  2. Carlton v. BoudarSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
  3. Virginia & Southwestern Railway Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  4. Douglas Land Co. v. T. W. Thayer Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  5. Lee v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Olson v. BricklesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  2. Webb v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  3. Virginia Hot Springs Co. v. HooverSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  4. Bell v. Routh Robbins Real Estate Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1966
  5. Stewart v. TamsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API