Legal Opinion

Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Sults

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1897No. 2204PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Prom the Noble Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.

This was an action brought by appellant against the appellee to recover possession of a sewing machine. Appellee answered the complaint by a general denial. Prior to bringing the action, to-wit: on the 17th .day of May, 1895, appellant, by written contract, had sold the machine in controversy to appellee, by the terms of which contract the title to the machine was to remain in appellant until it was fully paid for, and upon failure of appellee to pay for the same as provided in said contract, appellant was entitled to its immediate- possession. The cause was *640submitted to the court for trial,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chapin v. . DobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Bethell v. BethellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Conant v. National State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Burt v. BowlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Western Paving & Supply Co. v. Citizens' Street RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCaskey Register Co. v. CurfmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Wabash Railroad v. GrateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Hardin v. SweeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Sonneborn v. S. F. Bowser & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API