Legal Opinion

Gettinger v. Gettinger

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 1, 1964No. 33143PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the Writ and have heard argu-ment of the parties. After hearing argu■ment and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Petition is without merit.

The District Court of Appeal held, and -we agree, the language of Central Farmers Trust Co. v. Pinkham, et al., 108 Fla. 355, 146 So. 563, is not authority for the contention of the petitioner. To the end that doubt be resolved we hold that the affairs of a corporation, even though substantially owned by a decedent, cannot be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Central Farmers Trust Co. v. PinkhamSupreme Court of Florida · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bankatlantic v. Estate of GlatzerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Perez v. LopezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Swartz v. RussellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. ESTATE OF ARRIOS OUANELUS v. LOYDDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  5. JOHN W. RICH, JR., etc. v. JUDITH R. NAROGDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API