Legal Opinion

Pierson v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1950No. Civ. 17422PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Review of proceedings of the Industrial Accident Commission. November 14, 1947, petitioner George D. Pierson, while employed as a mine foreman, sustained injury arising out of and in the course of his employment resulting in total disability.

The commission found that at the time of the injury Pierson was employed by Livingston Greenwood who was then insured by Colonial Insurance Company. An award was made accordingly. Thereafter, on petition of Colonial, a rehearing was granted. After further hearings the commission found that at the time of the injury Pierson was employed by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Press Publishing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Industrial Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. California C. I. Exch. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Riskin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. General Acc. Etc. Corp. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. California Compensation Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. California Comp. Ins. Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Argonaut Insurance Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Tate v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API