Legal Opinion

Samuel Hiester v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 2016No. ED102985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoy L. Richter, Judge

Samuel Hiester (“Driver”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a trial de novo, sustaining the Director of Revenue’s (“Director’s”) decision to suspend Driver’s license for driving with a blood-alcohol concentration (“BAC”) of 0.08 percent or more, in violation of Section 302.505.1, RSMo (2000). We affirm. 1

I. Background

Driver was arrested upon probable cause to believe he was driving while intoxicated on August 6, 2014. Driver consented to submit to a breath test on an Intox DMT breath analyzer 2 and the results showed his BAC was .164 percent, more than double the. legal limit…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. White v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  3. Bender v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Philip Lorenzo Gallagher v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Selix v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Philip Lorenzo Gallagher v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Taylor L. Shomaker v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Thomas Michael Prade v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Joseph Schneider v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Saiaditya Kadapa v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API