Samuel Hiester v. Director of Revenue
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRoy L. Richter, Judge
Samuel Hiester (“Driver”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a trial de novo, sustaining the Director of Revenue’s (“Director’s”) decision to suspend Driver’s license for driving with a blood-alcohol concentration (“BAC”) of 0.08 percent or more, in violation of Section 302.505.1, RSMo (2000). We affirm. 1
I. Background
Driver was arrested upon probable cause to believe he was driving while intoxicated on August 6, 2014. Driver consented to submit to a breath test on an Intox DMT breath analyzer 2 and the results showed his BAC was .164 percent, more than double the. legal limit…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- White v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
- Bender v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Philip Lorenzo Gallagher v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Selix v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Philip Lorenzo Gallagher v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Taylor L. Shomaker v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Thomas Michael Prade v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Joseph Schneider v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Saiaditya Kadapa v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016