Legal Opinion

In re Heinzl

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1991No. Comm. No. 89-1280PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT OF CENSURE

This matter having come on for review before the Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona, it having duly rendered its decision, and no timely appeal therefrom having been filed,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

1. JOE LAWRENCE HEINZL, a member of the State Bar of Arizona, is hereby censured and condemned for conduct unworthy of and in violation of his duties and obligations as a lawyer, as disclosed in the captioned proceedings.

2. Respondent shall pay to the State Bar of Arizona costs and expenses incurred in this matter in the sum of $4,990.54 with…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of HansenArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ramada Franchise Systems, Inc. v. Capitol View II Ltd. Partnership VentureDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API